Eleven years after she won the Booker Prize for The God of Small Things, 14 conversations (2001-2008 ) with Roy on her social and political activism appear in a new book The Shape of the Beast.
Even before The God of Small Things hit the world of fame, this female Rushdie of India attracted lot of media attention when she criticised Shekhar Kapur’s film Bandit Queen, based on the life of Phoolan Devi, charging Kapur with exploiting Devi and misrepresenting both her life and its meaning. For sometime Roy was involved as film script writer as well. She even tried her hands at acting in films. Not many remember but Arundhati Roy played a village girl in the award-winning movie Massey Sahib.
(Click on the Image for a Video of an Interview with Arundhati Roy on The Shape of the Beast).
The Shape of the Beast finds Roy fulminating against the 2002 Godhra genocide, empathising with the adivasis of Dantewada in Chhattisgarh and venting against the military operations in Nagaland, Kashmir and Manipur.Through this book Roy has revealed both a personal and social journey.
“In India, people who are politically radical are socially conservative and those who are socially radical are politically conservative – and I’m torn between the two. It is about the same dilemma that I face as a writer. The book is somewhere between the spoken and the written word and answers fundamental questions”, says Arundhati, the architect turned writer.
In these conversations, Roy talks about the necessity of taking a stand, as also the dilemma of guarding the private space necessary for writing in a world that demands urgent, unequivocal intervention.
Five of the fourteen conversations are with David Barsamian, an American radio producer, who has also interviewed the likes of Noam Chomsky, Edward Said and Tariq Ali. Couple of years ago, Barsamian and Roy had co-authored a similar book
The Checkbook and the Cruise Missile: Conversations with Arundhati Roy
Says Barsamian, “She is a strong, courageous woman and has strong thoughts, as do many of the others I have interviewed. She is also mischievous and has spoken candidly on a range of issues that have mattered to her, around her,” said David Barsamian, founder of Alternative Radio.”
In these writings Roy describes her participation in a Narmada Bachao Andolan as, “absolutely fantastic.” She jokes that her Supreme Court charge for “corrupting public morality”-in the case of her novel The God of Small Things-should have been changed to “further corrupting public morality.” She calls on her training as an architect to explain what she means by the “physics of power.” Like a house of cards, she argues that “unfettered power . . . cannot go berserk like this and expect to hold it all together.”
Roy is a spokesperson of the anti-globalization/alter-globalization movement and a vehement critic of neo-imperialism and of the global policies of the United States. She is very critical of India’s nuclear weapons policies and the approach to industrialization and rapid development as currently being practiced in India.
Arundhati Roy who is also vying with Salman Rushdie for The Best of Booker, is popular for her searching and fierce prose. People do await another work of fiction from this celebrated author. Since The God of Small Things (which is now published in 32 languages), she has published two volumes of her non-fiction writing, The Algebra of Infinite Justice (2001) and An Ordinary Person’s Guide to Empire (2005).
(The Shape of the Beast published by Penguin in hardback cover is priced Rs 499)
I like her too.
[…] Roy has released a new book. Read more Here is a review and a link to an interview with the […]
I think she is fantastic…Inspirational
[…] with Roy on her social and political activism appear in a new book The Shape of the Beast…https://helloji.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/shape-of-the-beast/Roy&39s RV Supercenter 1-800-447-7697Located in Elkins. Sells a variety of new […]
Undoubtedly, Roy is one of the dazzling writers of India. But her latest book, The Shape…, does become too vehemently critical in certain parts. One portion has her blaming the Left patriarch and the first CM of Kerala, the late EMS Namboodiripad, as siding with the Birlas and opening the Mavoor Rayons Factory, thus polluting the Chaliyar river and harming the lives of the workers and the locals. She concludes that he has done little to benefit the people of Kerala. But she misses the point that then there was no telling of the Outcomes of setting up the factory, as it was with the blessing of the 2nd 5 year plan and the green signal of the PCB that it was started. It was a classic case of a well-intended initiative gone loose.
Secondly, she criticises the Kerala Universities as being the worst in the country. Too unfounded a criticism? Well, there is no hiding the fact that except for a few elite universities in India, all the rest are on the same sobrely painful footing. Fund crunch and outdated syllbi are realities. But the UGC has the responsibility to pay attention to all members equally and make them beneficiaries. There is no hiding the fact that politics dogs the apex body and regional favouritism has long been a complaint. It is an irony that the state with the highest literacy and graduate to population ratio has a dearth of uality opportunities for higher edu.
The God… had also kicked up a lot of dust as in it too were anti-Kerala remarks ( though the author couldn’t resist using the Kerala landscape for crafting the novel).
A fact being that her mother is settled in Kerala, living on its resources and is running an elite school near my hometon, wich is unimaginably inaccessible to the commoners and reserved for the posh and the wealthy, one wonders why the little Roy is mindfully overlooking mommy Roy’s activities….. ‘fighting against capitalism on the fore, siding with the elite at the back. It would be nice to know what the author has done for the state , by using her Booker Prize money or otherwise, so that she may have some teeny-weeny justification for her criticism.
I only hope and pray that instead of blacking the face of a unique state, she does a small exercise of self-introspection. Blunt and unconstructive criticism is not worth its weight .
I wish she gets a Nobel prize for Peace – for speaking on behalf of the underdog
Anny